1 | Reviewer 1; notes and actions KL; 10Jul20
|
---|
2 | =============================
|
---|
3 |
|
---|
4 | Notes from review:
|
---|
5 | ------------------
|
---|
6 | 1. As suggested by review 2; need to compress and make more robust. JPar
|
---|
7 | 2. PUSH back; detail is required for critical reading and to allow KL
|
---|
8 | interested experts to validate our claims.
|
---|
9 | 3. OK; we can answer some of these questions; some questions we can KL
|
---|
10 | not answer.
|
---|
11 | 4. OK; the answer is cost and efficiency. Need to make more clear CW
|
---|
12 | the reasons wht we have chosen the Gabor lens and that the
|
---|
13 | solenoid fall-back froms at a price.
|
---|
14 | 5. Yes, this is a good point. We need to address it as it helps KL
|
---|
15 | hone our message. Indeed, LhARA is a proof of principle for
|
---|
16 | technologies that can be developed for the clinic. Need to
|
---|
17 | update text and respond in cover letter.
|
---|
18 | 6. Should we add comments in the motivation? JPar
|
---|
19 | Also, justify from patients point of view.
|
---|
20 | 7. Hmm -- OK, lets re-adjust this. KL
|
---|
21 | 8. Address by making revisions required and arguing that the KL
|
---|
22 | article is a consistent whole in the cover letter.
|
---|
23 | 9. Repeat of 1. JPar
|
---|
24 | 10. OK. TSD
|
---|
25 | 11. Consider in revision. JPar
|
---|
26 | 12. Consider in revision. JPar
|
---|
27 | 13. Consider in revision. KL
|
---|
28 | 14. OK, check and implement! TSD
|
---|
29 | 15. Consider in revision. KL
|
---|
30 | 16. Consider in revision. KL
|
---|
31 | 17. Minor text revision. WS/JPa
|
---|
32 | 18. Push back in cover letter. KL
|
---|
33 | 19. Consider in revision. KL
|
---|
34 | 20. Consider in revision. KL
|
---|
35 | 21. Agreed. Small txt update. KL
|
---|
36 | 22. Consider in revision. JPar/KL
|
---|
37 | 23. Consider in revision. JPar/KL
|
---|
38 |
|
---|
39 | Notes from "comments":
|
---|
40 | ----------------------
|
---|
41 | 1. As in 1. above; revise text. JPar
|
---|
42 | 2. Respond in cover letter; some changes in txt will be referre to. KL
|
---|
43 | 3. Actions noted in 11 above, add comment in cover letter. KL
|
---|
44 |
|
---|
45 | -------- -------- // -------- --------
|
---|
46 |
|
---|
47 | Reviewer 2; notes and actions KL; 10Jul20
|
---|
48 | =============================
|
---|
49 |
|
---|
50 | Notes from review:
|
---|
51 | ------------------
|
---|
52 | 1. Need reference to timescales in response. JPar/KL
|
---|
53 | Revise text/references.
|
---|
54 | 2. As in Reviewer1, 1. Update text. JPar
|
---|
55 | 3. As in Reviewer1, 1. Update text. JPar
|
---|
56 | 4. Explain space-charge limit; short text JPa
|
---|
57 | 5. Reference (perhaps text revision?) OE
|
---|
58 | 6. Fix in caption WS
|
---|
59 | 7. Agreed; revise sentence and provide reference. OE
|
---|
60 | 8. Discuss: do we need a plot? Add reference at least. OE
|
---|
61 | 9. Add sentence to explain. CW
|
---|
62 | 10. Potential repetition; consider revision. OE/KL
|
---|
63 | 11. Potential repetition; consider revision. OE/KL
|
---|
64 | 12. Fix figure (bright colours); fix caption (description) WS
|
---|
65 | 13. Answer question in cover letter. WS/JPar
|
---|
66 | 14. It can; update text, address in cover letter. JPar/KL
|
---|
67 | 15. Add sentence with requested information. JPa/JPar
|
---|
68 | 16. Add comment in caption. HTL
|
---|
69 | 17. Address in text? Also, push back in cover letter. GS/AP
|
---|
70 |
|
---|
71 | Notes from comments:
|
---|
72 | --------------------
|
---|
73 | 1. Take issue with the characterisation that this is not KL
|
---|
74 | science (!) in cover letter.
|
---|
75 | 2. Push back on reproducibility in cover letter. WS/JPa/KL
|
---|
76 |
|
---|
77 |
|
---|
78 | Push back on Q6; Would like to point Gabor lens and acceleration --> unique.
|
---|
79 |
|
---|
80 | -------- -------- // -------- --------
|
---|
81 |
|
---|
82 | Calorimeters at NPL for dose; Tony Price.
|
---|